Why I’m tempted to disassociate myself from the “9/11 Truth Movement”
Abel Ashes
6-12-2008
Prior to the 9/11 tragedy I had been researching the Oklahoma City and CIA involvement with drug smuggling. Of those two issues the one I felt more comfortable speaking openly about was the CIA/drugs issue, mainly due to the fact that I could speak out on the issue without anyone falsely assuming that I supported narcotics smuggling. You see, in Southern California in the 1990s it was almost impossible to get anyone left of David Duke to even consider the possibility that a wider conspiracy existed because all evidence that contradicted the “official story” was thought to be aimed at acquitting that mass murdering psycho Timothy McVeigh. As it was for McVeigh so it is for Al-Qaeda.
When the 9/11 attacks happened I immediately suspected Osama Bin Laden’s involvement and I immediately suspected that some individuals connected with the petro/narcotics/weapons world probably knew and wanted it to happen. Within the first week I was using my music performances as an excuse to get on the microphone and read from news articles that began coming out in the mainstream press documenting multiple warnings. I was protesting in the streets of San Diego with a sign linking terrorism with the CIA less than two weeks after the attacks.
I spent the entire first year after 9/11 learning how to give up on happiness, give up my dreams, starve myself even though it was the first time in my life I was making a livable wage all for the cause of getting everything out into the open so that I could at least know that I did everything I could to prevent a long and bloody World War 4. I gave 9/11 timelines out by the hundreds to Republicans attending an award ceremony for Dick Cheney. I covered San Francisco in 9/11 info graffiti for months. Then on 9/11/02 I met Cosmos, Carol Broullet, Scott Munson, and some folks from the Uhuru Movement offshoot All Peeps Coalition and we did some “Bush Did It” demos where the theme was “Whether it was incompetence, complicity, or conspiracy…Bush Did It!.” I was one of the cofounders of the Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance. I helped promote the work of Mike Ruppert, John Judge, Nafeez Ahmed, and Don Paul. I met Jim Hoffman and encouraged him to challenge Mike Ruppert to take up the demolition issue and to start his own website.
I gave away free copies of Alex Jones 9/11 videos (mostly because he gave permission to do so) even though I might have preferred some more careful analysis. After giving one video to a friend at work I was tackled, handcuffed, and fired. I contacted Stanley Hilton, an attorney who was suing Bush over 9/11 allegedly on behalf of 400 9/11 victims’ family members (that turned out to be a lie). He agreed to sue my employer pro-bono and then asked me to join the 9/11 lawsuit which he said was being rewritten to include violations related to the use of 9/11 to promote the Iraq War. Basically any American taxpayer could join the new lawsuit under the Federal Taxpayer section related to recouping misappropriated funds related to the War in Iraq (this money would be taken from contractors and returned to the US Treasury). However, people such as myself were not included as plaintiffs in the RICO section dealing with 9/11. Unfortunately Mark Robinowitz (who is generally more accurate than your average 9/11 Truther, did not and does not understand that there were two lawsuits. Making matters worse Stanley began filing documents based on the nonsense theories included in films such as “In Plane Site” and Loose Change”. He then revealed that there were only 40 plaintiffs not 400 and claimed to have never said “400 plaintiffs”. He said “400” to the SF Examiner. He said “400” on the “Alex Jones Show” multiple times. He said “400” to me multiple times. He lied.
So far I had wasted 4 years on this issue, while all kinds of human rights abuses, environmental degradation, economic stupidity, and other problems continued to devastate our world I remained fixated on the events of 9/11 because I was convinced (still am) that government secrecy and acquiescence to organized crime are two of the most neglected root causes of much of the suffering that ordinary people are subjected to around the world. I began organizing here in Louisville and eventually got a small group together. Cosmos founded Truth Action and The 11th of Every Month campaign and I immediately saw the potential for this being the campaign that would break through. I’ve been a part of this from day one, but I don’t know if I can be anymore. At least not in the way I have been in the past.
Over the past 7 years I’ve studied a lot. I read nonfiction exclusively. I read “truther” books. I read “debunker” books. I read “mainstream” books. My opinions have changed frequently over the years as I fell for disinformation, then realized my mistake and corrected it. However, in all of that time two things have not changed. I remain convinced that Al-Qaeda was involved in 9/11 and that a small group of individuals inside my nation’s government were too. But if I had to name the best 9/11 investigators only a few “truthers” would make the list. Let me cut to the chase…I cannot live with myself if I remain associated with a movement that at times at least borders of being sympathetic Jihadist terrorists and at the very least frequently denies that any “terrorism” exists aside from “false flag terrorism”. My conscience, my intellect and my sense of self respect will not allow me to fly the banner of “9/11 Truth” as long as “9/11 Truth” remains in denial of the very real danger of radical Islamism and other violent fanatics on the far-right and far-left.
Until the “9/11 Truth Movement” realizes that our responsibility is to tell the truth not to defend everyone accused of terrorism (even the guilty ones) I cannot be a part of this anymore.
Unfortunately the Truth Movement has begun focusing exclusively on evidence (both real and imagined) linking 9/11 to The Bush Administration, the neo-cons, Israel, The CIA, “the globalists” (which “globalists?”), “The Illuminati” (which hasn’t existed since the 1700s), while ignoring evidence linking Al-Qaeda to 9/11. It reminds me of an incident in Reno, Nevada when I handed a girl a flier about 9/11 and she put her fingers in her ears and said, “la, la, la, la, la, la, la!” That’s similar to how most “Truthers” behave when any evidence implicating Al-Qaeda is brought up. It’s denial plain and simple.
I am still very interested in getting to the whole truth about 9/11 and I think that the best way is by writing a book. Fliers are not the best way to analyze such a complex issue and truth be told, most of the time documentary videos barely scratch the surface.
If I had one wish for the 9/11 truth Movement, the thing that would cure the social disease that has corrupted this once promising movement, it is simply this: read about Al-Qaeda, read the statements of Al-Qaeda, read the statements of ex-Al-Qaeda members, read the statements of Bin Laden’s family members and childhood friends. Read “The Terror Timeline” by Paul Thompson in it’s entirety, front to back. Read the longer timeline at http://cooperativeresearch.org and the astounding research of terrorism investigator J.M. Berger at http://intelwire.com . Read all three of Peter Lance’s books “1,000 Years For Revenge”, Cover-Up” and especially “Triple Cross”. Read “The Osama Bin Laden I Know” by Peter Bergen. Read “The Al-Qaeda Connection” by Paul L. Williams. Read “Masterminds of Terror” by Yosri Fouda and Nick Fielding. Read “Perfect Soldiers” by Terry McDermott. If you don’t have time for all that at least read “The Road To 9/11” by Peter Dale Scott.
As for the 11th of every month…I’ll be working on my book.

http://intelwire.egoplex.com/documents.html#911
thx for the reading list; i suggest you reread The Terror Timeline, Road to 9/11 and War on Truth by Nafeez Ahmed; in your years of research and disinfo debunking, how have you come to the conclusion that “al Qaeda” is really separate from the CIA, ISI and other agencies? Surely you are aware the US govt was creating terror textbooks that were used in Afghanistan for 20 years- evil geniuses like Brzezinski thought radicalizing Muslims would be helpful in a proxy war against the USSR- did he/they also not realize that, like Operation Gladio, they might be useful for future proxy wars as well as populace “shock & awe” to justify a surveillance state and an endless war on terror for geostrategic resources?
If 9/11 and the subsequent history of terror alerts have proved anything, it’s that the disaffected and prone to violence Muslims are a minority in Islam, and the philosophy has been heavily cultivated by Western states thru their imam operatives.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/18056504/truth_or_terrorism_the_real_story_behind_five_years_of_high_alerts
The People don’t want war- most people are not robbers, killers or terrorists- however our political process and media have been hijacked and many Americans are dumbed down by public ed and TV, and in a food coma. The numbers are changing- both economic hardships and technological breakthrus like the internet and wireless are improving access to info and communications- we can create a more transparent system that keeps robbers, killers and terrorists out of high office.
Hi
i like you’re critical thinking on this issue. the 9/11 movement is a mess.
perhaps you’d be interested in my newer book, ‘the war on truth: 9/11, disinformation and the anatomy of terrorism’. it does something most others don’t — which is focus on al-qaeda. the book’s a huge advancement both theoretically and empirically on the war on freedom, and far more in line with you what you’ve mentioned here.
best wishes on your writing.
Thanks for writing Nafeez!
Your book, “The War On Truth”is excellent I highly recommend it as well as your book on the Iraq war “Behind The War On Terror”.
I promoted your first book “The War On Freedom” very heavily when I was in San Francisco in 2002-2003. Your work is excellent.
thx for the reading list;
YOU’RE WELCOME.
I suggest you reread The Terror Timeline, Road to 9/11 and War on Truth by Nafeez Ahmed;
I DO REGULARLY.
in your years of research and disinfo debunking, how have you come to the conclusion that “al Qaeda” is really separate from the CIA, ISI and other agencies?
ARE YOU SAYING BIN LADEN IS A CIA AGENT? BIN LADEN IS AN AGENT OF HIS OWN TWISTED VERSION OF “ALLAH”. AL-QAEDA MUCH LIKE THE USSR DURING THE COLD WAR) HAS BEEN HEAVILY INFILTRATED BY THE CIA AND OTHERS AND AL-QAEDA KNOWS THIS AND HAS OFTEN EXPLOITED THE SITUATION TO THEIR OWN ADVANTAGE JUST LIKE THE US USED AL-QAEDA’S “BIG WEDDING”/”PLANES OPERATION” TO US GEOSTRATEGIC ADVANTAGE. BUT YES, INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES (SUCH AS THE CIA) HAVE CREATED, PROMOTED, AND PROVOKED TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS MANY TIMES. BIN LADEN WAS WORKING WITH THE ISI WHO WERE WORKING WITH THE CIA DURING THE WAR. LATER THE CIA FUNDED THE AL-KIFAH REFUGEE CENTER IN BROOKLYN. THE BLIND SHEIKH ABDEL RAHMAN WORKED WITH THE CIA IN “OPERATION CYCLONE”. ALI MOHAMED WORKED FOR THE CIA AND THE US ARMY BEFORE MOVING ON TO BEING A PAID FBI SPY IN AL-QAEDA AND A PAID AL-QAEDA SPY IN THE FBI. $100,000 DOLLARS WAS WIRED FROM OMAR SAEED SHEIKH UNDER ORDERS OF THE ISI DIRECTOR MAHMOUD AHMAD. AL-QAEDA IS NOT A PRO-CIA ORGANIZATION. AL-QAEDA IS AN ANTI-CIA ORGANIZATION. MY BOOK WILL FOCUS ON DOUBLE AGENTS INSIDE AL-QAEDA.
Surely you are aware the US govt was creating terror textbooks that were used in Afghanistan for 20 years- evil geniuses like Brzezinski thought radicalizing Muslims would be helpful in a proxy war against the USSR- did he/they also not realize that, like Operation Gladio, they might be useful for future proxy wars as well as populace “shock & awe” to justify a surveillance state and an endless war on terror for geostrategic resources?
YES AND YES. THAT DOESN’T MEAN THEY ARE A PRO-USA PUT-ON. SURELY YOU ARE AWARE THAT BIN LADEN HAS STATED THE DESIRE TO CREATE AN “AMERICAN HIROSHIMA” CAUSING 200,000 PLUS CIVILIAN DEATHS. I AGREE THAT OUR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ARE OFTEN MORE INTERESTED IN INFILTRATING, SPYING ON, AND PROVOKING AL-QAEDA INTO GEO-STRATEGIC ACTION IN ORDER TO USE THEM AS AN EXCUSE FOR FUTURE INVASIONS THAN IN PROTECTING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE (OR THE IRAQI OR AFGHANI PEOPLE).
If 9/11 and the subsequent history of terror alerts have proved anything, it’s that the disaffected and prone to violence Muslims are a minority in Islam, and the philosophy has been heavily cultivated by Western states thru their imam operatives.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/18056504/truth_or_terrorism_the_real_story_behind_five_years_of_high_alerts
I AGREE WITH YOU. THE MAJORITY OF MUSLIMS DON’T SUPPORT AL-QAEDA, HAMAS, OR HEZBOLLAH JUST LIKE THE MAJORITY OF WHITE PEOPLE DON’T SUPPORT THE KU KLUX KLAN OR ARYAN NATIONS AND THE MAJORITY OF PRO-LIFERS DON’T SUPPORT CLINIC BOMBINGS AND THE MAJORITY OF POLYGAMISTS DON’T SUPPORT CHILD RAPE AND THE MAJORITY OF POLICE DON’T WANT TO MURDER UNARMED BLACK TEENAGERS. HOWEVER, THAT DOESN’T MEAN THAT ISLAMIC TERROR GROUPS, WHITE SUPREMICIST GROUPS, CLINIC BOMBERS, CHILD MOLESTERS, AND RACIST COPS DON’T EXIST. IT DOESN’T MEAN THEY AREN’T DANGEROUS. AL-QAEDA HAS KILLED MORE MUSLIMS THAN NON-MUSLIMS. MUSLIMS THAT DON’T SUPPORT AL-QAEDA DO NOT APPRECIATE THE US EXPLOITING AL-QAEDA FOR GEO-STRATEGIC REASONS AND THEY ALSO DON’T APPRECIATE NAIVE WESTERNERS RUSHING TO DEFEND AL-QAEDA’S REPUTATION WITH SOME CONVOLUTED ILLOGICAL MUMBO JUMBO. IT OFTEN GOES SOMETHING LIKE THIS, “AL-QAEDA DIDN’T DO 9/11. THE CIA/BUSH/ISI/SAUDI ARABIA/ISRAEL/GREAT BRITAIN DID.BUT AL-QAEDA IS RUN BY THE CIA/BUSH/ISI/SAUDI ARABIA/ISRAEL/GREAT BRITAIN. BUT AL-QAEDA DOESN’T EXIST. HUH?
The People don’t want war- most people are not robbers, killers or terrorists- however our political process and media have been hijacked and many Americans are dumbed down by public ed and TV, and in a food coma.
I AGREE WITH THE FIRST PART, DISAGREE SOMEWHAT WITH THE SECOND. MOST PEOPLE ARE NOT ROBBERS, KILLERS, OR TERRORISTS. HOWEVER SOME ARE AND MANY IN GOVERNMENTS DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN ARE AS WELL. “THE TERROR TIMELINE” IS A COLLECTION OF ARTICLES FROM “MEDIA”. MOST JOURNALISTS ARE INTERESTED IN TELLING THE TRUTH. MOST MAJOR MEDIA IS INFILTRATED BY GOVERNMENT OPERATIVES OF ONE SORT OR ANOTHER (SEE “OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD”). HOWEVER THAT PROBLEM EXISTS AT THE MANAGEMENT LEVEL NOT THE JOURNALISTIC LEVEL. THE ONLY REASON WE KNOW 3/4 OF WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT HOW MUCH WE’VE BEEN LIED TO ABOUT 9/11 IS BECAUSE REPORTERS IN “THE MEDIA” TOLD US. AMERICANS NEED TO QUIT WORRYING ABOUT HAVING AN OPINION AND GET THEIR FACTS STRAIGHT. WE ALSO NEED TO READ THE NEWS INSTEAD THE OP-EDS.
The numbers are changing- both economic hardships and technological breakthrus like the internet and wireless are improving access to info and communications- we can create a more transparent system that keeps robbers, killers and terrorists out of high office.
YES, BUT ONLY IF WE’RE SMART AND BRAVE ENOUGH TO BE ABLE TO DISCERN BETWEEN FACTS AND OPINIONS, BETWEEN HERESAY AND DOCUMENTATION, BETWEEN PROPAGANDA AND INFORMATION, BETWEEN IDEOLOGY AND ETHICS, BETWEEN BELIEVING AND THINKING, BETWEEN OVERSIMPLIFIED HALF-TRUTH AND THE ALWAYS MORE COMPLEX REALITY, BETWEEN REVOLUTIONARY POSTURING AND A TRUE DESIRE TO MAKE THINGS BETTER FOR EVERYONE.
I SUPPORT A NEW INVESTIGATION INTO 9/11 INVOLVING 9/11 FAMILY MEMBERS (NOT JUST THE “9/11 TRUTH FAMILIES”, BUT ALL OF THEM THAT DESIRE TO BE INVOLVED), AND EXPERTS IN VARIOUS RELEVENT FIELDS. THERE SHOULD BE A QUESTIONAIRE THAT IS USED TO QUALIFY OR DISQUALIFY EXPERTS FROM INVOLVEMENT. SOMETHING LIKE THIS:
1. DO YOU OBJECT TO THE INCLUSION OF EVIDENCE IMPLICATING AL-QAEDA?
2. DO YOU OBJECT TO THE INCLUSION OF EVIDENCE IMPLICATING THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION?
…THE ISI?
…THE CIA?
…MOSSAD?
…IRAQ?
…IRAN?
…SAUDI ARABIA?
…THE FBI?
…REPUBLICANS?
…DEMOCRATS?
…ET CETERA.
IF YOU ANSWER YES TO ANY OF THOSE QUESTIONS YOU SHOULD BE DISQUALIFIED FROM INVOLVEMENT DUE TO UNREASONABLE PREJUDICIAL BIAS.
YOU SHOULD PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT AL-QAEDA HAS TO SAY ABOUT AL-QAEDA.
ALSO PLEASE WATCH THE “SANTA BIN LADEN”/’FAKE BIN LADEN” VIDEO. DON’T LOOK AT DISTORTED STILLS OR WATCH ONE BLURRY DISTORTED FIVE SECOND CLIP. WATCH THE WHOLE THING. HE DOESN’T LOOK FAT OR CHUBBY AT ALL AND IT’S DEFINITELY HIM.